Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 0 of 92 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /home/flfl1154/git/flwg.com.au/sources/global.php on line 625
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/flfl1154/git/flwg.com.au/sources/global.php:625) in /home/flfl1154/git/flwg.com.au/sources/static_cache.php on line 230 Search results – Family Law Web Guide
No doubt alot of us have been emotionally effected and stressed by the biased methods which the CSA does business. So at what point does the CSA admit liability for increasing stress, creating health problems and causing emotional problems between parents by use of their biased, confronting approaches? Numerous occasions I have been ordered to pay, re-pay or similar additional CS based on a phone call from ex, then after numerous letters and demonstrations of proof do I have these orders over-turned. If I had simply been asked to confirm various matters then I would not have been placed under this pressure. Surely there are many others out there in similar circumstances, surely there are enough of us who could clearly demonstrate that deterioration of health, increases in stress etc can directly be attributable to the methods of the CSA - if so a class action and then sue the bast#$ds.!
the reality is, most assessments are grossly over rated..I pay over $700 per month for two kids and thats with 50/50 shared care. I am sorry but i don't go anywhere near spending that much on two kids in a month..sorry but the payments are for the kids not for the parent…if everyone did an honest days work then our society wouldn't be in this predicament. society would be better off if we were to place funds into an education fund or the like for future use, rather than passing to a prent who spends at their desire - cigarettes, rent, alcohol whatever…show me receipts that the money was spent on the children - yeah sure!
if its any wonder people work for cash - will be be soon, the legislation is flawed.
the children live with me 7 days out of 14, i live 200m from her in my own home. The kids have transitioned very well to live with me, hence i don't believe my ex having to move is an issue. The kids have a house with me.. Further i move every 12-24mths with my employer so they are used to it. She changed her mind because she realises i am stuck in a bind and all systems support the parent who earns less, and generally supports the mother more than the father. By changing she gets money in her pocket yet is not putting any out to contribute…i guess i will just have to default on loan and let the bank take the house. At least then I will only have to pay one mortgage and CSA payments rather than two mortgages and CSA.
She has been living rent free since Oct last year. During this time the agreement between us has been she pays me rent the equivalent of my child support payments to her, hence no exchange of money. However as of this week she wants the CSA to collect, however is refusing to pay me anything for the house.
I am in QLD and still obtaining exact details on super and other assets to commence negotiating for property settlement.
There is no written agreement for 'rent' rather how the child support was paid, however being the beneficiary she can change the method of collection whenever and however she likes. As for 'rent' she wont sign.. I recently told her in writing to either sign a rental agreement or she has 4 weeks to get out, after which I will change the locks.