Donate Child Support Calculator
Skip navigation

Fathers 4 Justice take complaints to judge's home

Angry dads have paid a visit to the Barnes home of a high court judge and claim they will continue until "fathers have justice".

Elsewhere DE said
Protests outside judges homes started long before F4J and were outside the homes of judges such as Butler-Schloss, Wall, Tyrer and Thorpe.
Ian Mason, Richmond Twickenham Times said
However, he did agree to meet Mr O'Connor and a few other members in his court chambers to discuss the contact rights of fathers after divorce and separation.
For crying out aloud! Why are they campaigning to be visitors in their children's lives instead of fathers? They have financial responsibility; so why are they not fighting to take full responsibility of their children?!!
Richmond Twickenham Times (England)
Richmond borough news
18 April 2008

Fathers 4 Justice take complaints to judge's home
By Ian Mason

Dads protest outside Judge Coleridge's home

Angry dads have paid a visit to the Barnes home of a high court judge and claim they will continue until "fathers have justice".

A protest was held by 35 members of Fathers 4 Justice (F4J) outside the home of Judge Paul Coleridge, in Melville Road, on Saturday, April 12, over his condemnation of the Government for failing to act over family breakdown and teenage deaths.

Former Richmond resident and F4J member Mark Harris said: "It sticks in my throat to see this man passing the buck in this way because his family courts fail.

"My case took 10 years of litigation, 133 court cases and 1million of taxpayers money wasted. If Coleridge and the previous 32 judges had done their job in the first place, none of this farce would have taken place."

Leader of F4J Matt O'Connor spoke to Judge Coleridge over the phone. He allegedly refused to leave his house to meet protesters and complained that the demonstration was an inconvenience to his neighbours.

However, he did agree to meet Mr O'Connor and a few other members in his court chambers to discuss the contact rights of fathers after divorce and separation.

One F4J member, currently involved in a legal battle over his children, said: "We'll be back in far larger numbers next time if he doesn't listen, and he won't be given notice that we are coming."

The Richmond and Twickenham Times attempted to contact Judge Coleridge but he was unavailable for comment.
It is the politicians who are responsible for writing the Acts which the judges are bound by. Lobbying a judge is not appreciated as they are meant to be protected from personal violence or intimidation.

When attacks against our Family Court inhabitants occurred it was appropriate that the community indicated that it was not appropriate.

The non-disclosure of judges addresses is in the long term best for our community.

It is in the appeal courts that judges are embarrassable as a consequence of their decisions.

The power of a speech on Hansard by a sympathetic politician has many uses.

In our political system Senators have more latitude to express themselves when empowered to do so.

Identify the appropriate Senator would be a good first step.

Was there any Family Law discussed during the 20/20 talkfest?

Can it be utilised to achieve a more functional resolution processes?

What is done for you, let it be done, what you must do, be sure you do it, as the wise person does today that what the fool will do in three days - Buddha
1 guest and 0 members have just viewed this.

Recent Tweets