Donate Child Support Calculator
Skip navigation

Signalling at the Newcastle Family Law Court

Add Topic

Newcastle Family Law Court has some strange goings on as solicitors shuffle papers

Yes I would like to inform this web site that during my application in a case in June of this year for shared custody I caught the ICL (name removed by moderator) and the Judicial Register (name removed by moderator) signaling each other and they were rigging my case.

The way that name removed by moderator was signaling the register was that she had a pile of papers in front of her and everytime I asked for a specific order in regards to gaining shared access to my son I noticed out of the corner of my eye that the ICL (name removed by moderator) was grabbing a few pieces of paper from the large pile that she had in front of her and she made a new pile of papers to the left of her and she would also make a new pile of papers to the right of her and at first I couldn't understand why she was doing this and then a few minutes later I remembered being told a rumor a few years ago that the solicitors signal the judge if they want to throw your case and so I decided to test it out to see if she was actually signaling in some way so I then asked the Register for an order in which I knew that I was going to get because of how easy and how insignificant it was and then when i did this (name removed by moderator) grabbed a few pieces of paper and moved it to the right and sat these pieces of paper on top of the new pile to the right and then i looked up at Judicial Register (name removed by moderator) and he kept looking at (name removed by moderator) movements and so I said to myself ok I will now ask for an order that I know that I am not going to get because of the difficulty that would be involved in it and see what happens so i asked the register for this really hard order one that I knew I wouldn't get and to my amazement (name removed by moderator) grabbed a few pieces of paper from the big main pile that was in front of her and she moved these pieces of paper to the left hand side and I watched Judicial Register (name removed by moderator) eyes when I asked this and he looked straight over to (name removed by moderator) movements and then when he watched which side (name removed by moderator) moved the papers to he then said no and I have to admit the most exciting feeling I have ever had in my life came over me as i just caught the Judicial Register and the ICL signaling each other and rigging my case.

I have been in the Family Law Court for just over 3 years now and I first heard the rumor about 4 years ago from a few people that I knew who had cases going on in the Newcastle Family Law Court and at first i was a bit skeptical about these rumors and when I was first in the Family Law Court i did watch all of the movements to see if in some way i could notice some type of signaling going on between the solicitors and Judges and there was nothing that stood out that i could definitely say right they were signaling so after a while i forgot about it and all of that changed in June of this year when i caught (name removed by moderator)and Judicial Register (name removed by moderator) signaling.

I know alot of people may read this and say well you might have been seeing things and it may have appeared to you that they were signaling and for all of those people who are thinking this then i would like to ask you this.


On July the 9th I was given a hearing date for my application in a case and the orders that i was seeking was for my case to be transferred to the Parramatta Family Law Court and for also the 2 solicitors who are currently involved in my case and this being my X partners solicitor and (name removed by moderator) the ICL to be stood down and never again to be involved in my case again and also that my case is never to be heard at the Newcastle Family Law Court ever again and this time the manager of the Newcastle Family Law Court intervened and had Justice (name removed by moderator) hearing my application in a case and I secretly filmed the entire proceedings and when it started I was informed by (name removed by moderator) that my X partners solicitor also has put in an application in a case and that she will also be hearing that as well and then informed (name removed by moderator) that I knew nothing about this application by my X partners solicitor and she informed me to read the application and go through it while she also reads it and then I told her that i will not and that if she continues reading it then i will walk out of this courtroom and go home and (name removed by moderator) continued reading it and so i stood up and walked out and went home.

A few days later I received a letter in the mail from the Newcastle Family Law Court and all of the orders stated that they were prepared to start letting me see my child and also all of these other orders granting me all of these things that i had been asking for ever since I started and they did this because i caught them signaling and also because I informed them that i am going to the media to try and expose the signaling that is going on in there and they were that scared about this being exposed in the media that they granted me all of these orders on July the 9th and I had even walked out of that hearing and i wasn't even there and yet Justcie (name removed by moderator) granted me all of them so if I am seeing things or thought that i had seen some type of signaling then why did Jusctice (name removed by moderator)all of a sudden grant me all of these orders that I had been trying to get for 3 years.


I made a complaint to the human rights commission and also the Legal Services Commission and I received replies back from both of them and they said that the Judges and Judicial registers who work in the Family Law Courts are completely immune from any type of prosecution or any type of investigation.


So now I have been given a trial date for November the 18th and i am still trying to get my case transferred to the Parramatta Family Law Court and they have ignored every letter that I have sent them and now I have informed the Newcastle Family Law Court that i don't want anything from them and I am not recognizing the ICL at all and i am pretty much at a stalemate with them.


Im sorry to inform everyone but the solicitors and the judges have a secret signaling code that only they know about and its similar to a sign language and its only something that they know about and so it doesn't matter how much money you pay your solicitor or how good your evidence is it will not matter as they will resort to signaling each other in there secret coded messages that only they understand and they will throw your case and there is absolutely nothing stopping them from doing it and there is no way of having them investigated at all so pretty much the government has given them a free ticket.


So what I was wondering was if there was anyone with some advice or if they knew of a solicitor who could somehow come up with a way to have my case transferred to the Parramatta Family Law Court away from the signaling that is going on within Newcastle Family Law Court.


Thanx for reading my story and for any help you can offer me. Cheers (name removed by moderator)
The use of identifying information is not allowed and the poster, who identified himself, should be aware that making a statement about secret video recordings in court is asking for trouble. The story is interesting and how it is followed up is yet to be determined
Do you know if this happens with any other judges or report writers please as I am party to a case next month in Newcastle.
Posts from this topic have been moved by members. 13 posts have been transferred to topicview.

Executive Secretary - Shared Parenting Council of Australia
 Was my post helpful? If so, please let others know about the FamilyLawWebGuide whenever you see the opportunity
 
That sounds like 'a current affair' material. They may be immune from investigation but they are not immune from media scrutiny!
I only hope they arent up to no good in Perth court otherwise im screwed before i even start against my exs "TOP Lawyer as he always threatens - amazing what money can buy - against me self representing myself aaaahhhh!!!!
Look for anyone who is reading this I want you all to ask yourself a question I mean do you all honestly think that the solicitors who are involved in your case are not in some way getting in contact with the judge behind the scenes in some way I mean do you know how easy it is to send an email or call someone on there mobile and thats exactly how they rig your case as they have already decided on how they will rig your case before you even walk in the courtroom.

The judges and the solicitors have secret emails and mobile phones that they call each other on and they discuss your case and how they are going to rig it before you even walk in the doors and if anyone thinks for one second that this doesnt happen then i am telling you all now you are all very niave.

Some of the comments made have been deleted

Last edit: by Secretary SPCA

Well they are certainly a few conspiracy theorists here. It is well know that third year law students are taught secret signs and a secret sign language to communicate non verbally in Court.

If you want to know more, send me $50 for my exclusive book 'Secret Signs used by Lawyers' and as a bonus you will receive a free copy of 'How to catch the Fairies that live at the end of your Garden' plus a bonus set of plans to build your own UFO.
Interesting but I fail to see any relevance apart from conspiracy theories and paranoia. 

Executive Member of SRL-Resources, the Family Law People on the site (Look for the Avatars).   Be mindful what you post in the public areas
Richard7632 said
LOL ive been in there for 3 years and im telling you theres that much corruption and collusion going on in there its not funny
If you have proper evidence then provide it in a format that site executives and other senior members can take up with appropriate authorities. A solicitor moving papers  around is hardly evidence of real substance that would stand up anywhere. I have many papers moving as questions arise to immediately locate competing and or relevant affidavit material so moving papers on each question is hardly ground breaking evidence surely.

I have been involved in a number of matters through Newcastle and to date I have not had any that would qualify as unsatisfactory outcomes. Nor have we ever had such a suggestion that shuffling papers constitutes serious corruption. There have been a number of items on the site about some of the more interesting cases at NewCastle and one or two news items about some of the Federal Magistrates. They all seem to be quite positive from what I have read to date.

Some of the posts in this thread have been removed as they contribute nothing and some links go to sites that have nothing to do with Family Law either at NewCastle or elsewhere. Some commentary is defamatory and needs to be deleted although a lot is already now cached in Google Search. How much of the story is fact and fiction is open to conjecture but certainly an interesting story. So apologies to any "regulars" if the thread has somewhat been hijacked.


Executive Secretary - Shared Parenting Council of Australia
 Was my post helpful? If so, please let others know about the FamilyLawWebGuide whenever you see the opportunity
 
this web site is def run by family law court shills i mean really can u actually sink any lower then to make up a web site full of lies about the family

Dictionary.com said
shill
Show Spelled [shil] Show IPA Slang .
noun
1.
a person who poses as a customer in order to decoy others into participating, as at a gambling house, auction, confidence game, etc.

Origin:
192025;  orig. uncert.

i like the part where u said u have been involved in newcastle and u havnt seen any unsatisfactory outcomes to this date

I dont think ive ever heard such rubbish in my life ok now listen to me ok ya moron go and live with your parens and go let them look after ok and dont worry about me posting anymorte on here as i dont post comments on a web site run by family law cour shills seriously i dont think ive ever read anything that was so funny

Everyone who reads this web site I am telling you right now it is being run by Family law Court shills ok forget about posting on here its been run by the family law court
Secretary SPCA said
Conan said
…. It is well know that third year law students are taught secret signs and a secret sign language to communicate non verbally in Court.
I can't wait!
Conan said
If you want to know more, send me $50 for my exclusive book 'Secret Signs used by Lawyers' and as a bonus you will receive a free copy of 'How to catch the Fairies that live at the end of your Garden' plus a bonus set of plans to build your own UFO.
The only thing you didn't offer was the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. I must say though it was a pretty tempting offer until I realised you must have been taking the mickey as we all know there are no fairies at the end of your garden any longer they are all Pixies!!
  You should do some basic research, pixies are the ones that eat the magic mushrooms and I would be silly to promote the use of hallucinatory drugs. The Fairies are OK little people. The reason my book is so cheap is because I subsidize it with the money from the pot of gold and I am not silly enough to reveal where that is.


Must go, some of the pixies are making secret signs and passing notes to Richard.

Signalling from the Bench is very Common.

Yes - Its true - signalling from the bench is very common.

Usually it involves the Judge or Magistrate suggesting they are thinking about making particular orders or alternatively saying that they can't see any problem with a particular arrangement or party.

It is really a two fold message to the parties - either adjust what you are seeking or present more evidence to support what you are seeking. People who don't listen tend to get a surprise at the end.

For me - Shared Parenting is a Reality - Maybe it can be for you too!
Richard7632 said
…..i like the part where u said u have been involved in newcastle and u havnt seen any unsatisfactory outcomes to this date…
My experiences with cases at Newcastle have been relatively positive for the children of parties concerned. I can only quote from my experiences and that my experience in that jurisdiction have been relatively favourable and positive should hardly be cause for a tirade of abuse. I absolutely accept that sometimes one party or the other is far from satisfied with an outcome and sometimes they have themselves to blame. The judicial officers who have to sit daily dealing with only the worst of human behaviour is hardly an exciting task at best.

Some of us on the site here are at the coal face more than others, but through site interaction and with other agencies, attendance both in Magistrate and Family Courts and also contact with the SRL groups one can also get a feel for how things are going around the court system. If you have a valid complaint we are more than happy to take it up but complaints must be supportable, valid, reasonable and backed by fact not simply wide ranged salvos fired at everyone involved. We do the very best we can on a part time basis and give way more time than is reasonable in the circumstances. If you are not happy with information on the site you can easily vote with your mouse and visit somewhere else that has better information. From where I sit there is nothing else around that has such a wealth of factual and experienced real world information for not only litigants but others facing issues around separation in Au and NZ.

Executive Secretary - Shared Parenting Council of Australia
 Was my post helpful? If so, please let others know about the FamilyLawWebGuide whenever you see the opportunity
 
1 guest and 0 members have just viewed this.

Recent Tweets