Donate Child Support Calculator
Skip navigation

UHD

You know Conan et al there are at least two sides to every story BUT picking on a person's spelling and/or grammar is just petty and fickle.  Actually let me go a step further, the tone is bordering on misogynistic and is completely off track from the topic being discussed.
It is the sign of someone who has little to say that offers very nothing special in the way of advice or support for this person. Stop judging people ok.  You're not playing court with Conan being dressed up in robes pretending he's the big kahuna presiding over us all.

All your post shows is character defect and a small minded, nasty perspective.  I bet you're short Conan or bald or rather overweight. If not, then I'd have to say you're just a spiteful person who thrives on belittling others. Must have been pure joy for any woman residing with you if you go as far as to ridicule a person's spelling

Boo hoo and shame on you. What a horrible thing to say. I sincerely doubt if she didn't have a handle that was gender specific you'd have mentioned it.

Is this a site that supports opinionated viewpoints and actively promotes affording members the right  to insult and humiliate others?
Regardless of viewpoints or insinuations about a persons motives, nobody with ANYTHING worthwhile to say should resort to making comments that are in such poor taste.

Conan, didn't your mother ever teach you "if you can't say something nice don't say anything at all"? Well, guess what, on here you don't gave to be nice, you just have to treat people with respect. Why make a person feel even worse over spelling mistakes?

Come down off your self perceived throne, or high horse ok and GROW UP, because you're WAY  :offtopic:

PS. Unless you're an expert it might be wise to keep your comments to yourself because if I was marking what you write there'd be red pen on your page. Why? Because your posts are also prone to errors. You're overly verbose and bombastic. Smile and have a can of cheer the heck up ok:)        

Post being responded to by guest

motherconfused said
Thanks Conan for not denegrating me in anyway!!You may wish to review your post as it is not perfect with grammer or spelling either.
The site has a spell checker built into the posting area, not a grammAr checker. I am using the Australian/English dictionary from Firefox.
 
motherconfused said
Both parties have had issues with the ICL, forgetting childrens names, facts of the case, the ICL even got up in court one time and said that the other party sexaully abused one of our children when in fact it was another child (not much better but still relevant), as I said before, the ICL has contravened the orders by not doing what they were meant to on a number of occasions, this is becuase the clerk is "running" the case and the ICL is not across the case at all.
Only parties can contravene orders, ICLs and Lawyers only ignore Court directions. What is wrong with the Clerk running the case from the back room, happens on many occasions where they do much of the background work. How would you actually know this since the ICL will not speak to you?
 
motherconfused said
An ICL shouldn't be positive or negative towards other parties in the matter, they should be independant, so I find this an interesting observation from you Conan.
An ICL is there for the children not the parties, which of course will mean opinions will be formed about the parties parenting abilities. These opinions will of course be positive or negative with many shades of grey.
 
motherconfused said
I have had legal representation on and off for the last 3 years as I am sure you can imagine the costs involved, not perfect I know but unfortuantely required. I am sorry I have not provided a chronological order of events.
  Horrendous, that is why there are organisations that support SRLs.

Last edit: by MikeT

Guest said
You know Conan et al there are at least two sides to every story …..
Conan has not said anything to indicate that there are or are not facets. Conan has simply provided non biased advice on the ICL process. Guest either has some personal problem with literacy or guest is simply trying to introduce argument about a non existent issue.

Guest said
…. picking on a person's spelling and/or grammar is just petty and fickle.
The fact is that the FLWG portal, which includes the forums, has the intention of assisting the public in dealing with what can be complex issues that can have enduring consequences. The rules that any poster abides by include respect for others. To use ill formed grammar and include frequent misspelt words and to resort to slang or an over-abundance of unclear or unexplained acronyms is inconsiderate and thus disrespectful of others and therefore in contravention of the rules. Other sites that pander more to gossip than reality and advice may accept such selfishness; it is suggested that any who wish to post material that is inconsiderate and disrespectful of others post that material elsewhere. If such material is posted here then such material will be subject to potential deletion, editing as moderators see fit, or complaints regarding the inconsiderate and disrespectful composition of the material (this not being a fully comprehensive list).


Guest said
Actually let me go a step further, the tone is bordering on misogynistic and is completely off track from the topic being discussed.
I have absolutely no doubt that there is no bias at all in Conan's post. The post clearly states useful information. It is guest who has introduced a perception of gender bias. Considering there is no such evident bias then one can  hardly not consider that there is some issue with the guests mental reasoning which appears to meet the definition of a psychosis. In fact seeing a gender bias when there is no such bias evident clearly indicates that the person are themselves are in  fact biased and thus actually a hypocrite. That is assuming that guest is not a gender biased pathological liar.

Guest said
Is this a site that supports opinionated viewpoints and actively promotes affording members the right  to insult and humiliate others?
Regardless of viewpoints or insinuations about a persons motives, nobody with ANYTHING worthwhile to say should resort to making comments that are in such poor taste.
This site does give much latitude to opinionated viewpoints, as an example your post has not been deleted as it rightfully should be considering the uselessness, the distorted nature, the obvious underlying mental issues of the poster, and the highly hypocritical content of the post. The site does not promote members insulting others. The site does promote, as previously mentioned in this post and in other posts and in the rules to which every post has agreed to adhere to, respect and thus consideration of other members. Again latitude is often given and again as an example in your post guest as previously explained. If you have an issue with how the rules are interpreted then the suggestion is that you actually go elsewhere.

Guest said
Conan, didn't your mother ever teach you "if you can't say something nice don't say anything at all"? Well, guess what, on here you don't gave to be nice, you just have to treat people with respect. Why make a person feel even worse over spelling mistakes?
Did your mother teach you? Not that it's relevant who taught you as it is obvious that you cannot comply with your own expectations of others. I'd suggest that you learn something that a teacher taught me; go an locate a copy of "The Water Babies" by Charles Kingsley. It mentions two women with rather long names that may assist you not being hypocritical, although I very much doubt that.

Guest said
Come down off your self perceived throne, or high horse ok and GROW UP, because you're WAY off topic.
Oh dear, you can't even see that a) Conan was on topic and b) that you have not posted one word that is anywhere close to the topic. As you have now raised the subject of wearing crowns then I'd suggest that it is far more important that you consider removing the one that distinguishes you as the monarch of the hypocritical. That would likely automatically also remove the one that makes you so prone to self-humiliation as you'd actually then possibly consider what you write in the context of the subject matter rather than in the context of the delusional aspect that you distort that subject matter into. Again I suggest reading the book will be of assistance (although I do wonder if you have the ability to not consider the book as a gender biased diatribe simply because it doesn't suit your delusional outlook).
1 guest and 0 members have just viewed this.

Recent Tweets