Donate Child Support Calculator
Skip navigation

A personal rant

elmekatut.

You face a very uphill battle. The first thing to understand is that the lawyers, barristers, judges and magistrates are all private employees of the run for profit private company called the 'Family Court of Australia' which, is itself, also a subsidiary of the private run for profit company called 'The Commonwealth of Australia' which is a registered sovereign entity on the US Security and Exchange Commission. They are also all members of the British Law Society. Once you realise these people are all in cohoots you realise the magnitude of your problem.

You do have a remedy, but I would be the first to admit it is a long shot because we have not tried it yet in Australia. We hope to try it over the next 12 months or so.

It would be very unusual if you were offered full disclosure of the contracts you entered into with the FC. Therefore, if you feel you were deceived and are willing to state you were decieved under oath of affidvit you can create a de joury and have the matter settled by a de jour jury. A de jour jury is an empanelling of 12 men to hear the case and those 12 men decide the issue. (Ladies, the bible says 12 men so if you have a problem with that, please complain to God, not me.)

They decide this issue under common law as defined by the bible and accepted custom of the land in which they live.

I believe you will need to get to this level because I do not believe the state is going to compensate you for the deception unless they are forced to. The 12 'good men' of the Jury will decide if your right to the enjoyment of your property was unlawfully infringed and they decide what remedy is appropriate. Basically, you will put yourself and the magistrate before the court of law and the court of law (not court of commerce) will decide the issue.

I intend to do the same for the magistrate who unlawfully stole my house from me. I would love to throw him in jail for some years for fraud and theft. I do not have high hopes, but it would be great to get the trial onto youtube.

These magistrates are not above the law, common law that is. We are all equal before the law. No-one gets a 'pass' before common law.
What utter rubbish you have posted; this is not a venting site. People come he for helpful information not dogma.

Executive Member of SRL-Resources, the Family Law People on the site (Look for the Avatars).   Be mindful what you post in the public areas. 
To globalman.

Thank you for your replay, but I am looking for the possible, not that one that has never been tried before.

I don't like the idea of been a rabbit experiment.
globalmans story reminds me of the fathers who protested against payments to children they never saw. Also a person who I think told me that it is possible to take some type of  case from the family court to a twelve person jury. And persons who studiously stuck to the book in the most formal fashion they could offer, when in Court. And hopes by men that they had finally found a favorable means to resolve and end their court cases,whom were busy drafting the application. And one who refused to consent to an acknowledgement of a debt.

globalman

globalman was typical of the dogmatic types that occasionally arrive on this site. They find the FLWG and immediately realise they have a very large audience to propagate their strange political, legal and religious views and blast away without any care. His ideas and strategies were at total variance with accepted norms both in society and the Courts. Suggesting silly and ill conceived strategies that would lead others into making fools of themselves in Court is not tolerated on this site.

Globalman has claimed a dubious record on this site. 12 posts in less than 24 hours, the majority of which were removed by the moderators. He also received 8 warnings in less than 12 hours which is another record. Faced with an additional avalanche of moderator warnings and complaints by members of the FLWG his membership on this site was terminated.

FLWG and the moderators respect the right of robust comment and discussion but it will not allow fools and charlatans to peddle their wares.

 Senior Site Moderator and Administrator
1 guest and 0 members have just viewed this.

Recent Tweets