Donate Child Support Calculator
Skip navigation

Gentlemen - PAN has returned to inform you of update

Gentlemen,
the men on FLWB chose to ignore me and ignore my calls for assistance to re-introduce the rule of law into Australia. This was not a good idea on your part because the idea was to re-introduce the rule of law for the benefit of ALL Australians. Australian fathers failed their obligations, duties and responsibilities. A fact that your children will not miss as they grow older.

With the failure of the vast majority of Australian fathers to live up to their responsibilities, obligations and DUTY to defend the children of your land it has taken longer and cost more than it would have done should you men have answered my call when I first came here. You are well advised to keep in mind that men here were asked to sit on juries in our new courts some time ago. Men here were asked to join the Crimes Against Fathers site some time ago.

That the moderators of the FLWG are agents of the guvment is obvious and yet you men still come here in order to be lied to. That is not only stupid. It is pathetic and you should pay the price of being so pathetic and so ignorant.

Much has changed since I was last here. We now have 170 or so people in Australia who claim they are willing to sit on a jury in the new Peoples Courts Of Australia. We are missing a secretary for the court in Sydney and that is an indictment and disgrace on Sydney Fathers. Not ONE has the guts to run a court process. Not one.

Since I was last here you have had the introduction of your carbon tax. A few more people woke up to the guvment being a criminal cartel with the carbon tax but most of you slumber on like the sheeple you are being fleeced by the criminals in the guvment, the courts, the legal fraternity and all enforced by the cops.

And any man who thinks their politicians and lawyers are honest at this point in time deserves ALL the ills that befall him. I do not know how any man in Australia could be so stupid as to think the courts and guvment are honest at this point in time. Remember. My video was taken on 2009-11-26. It PROVED that the family courts were a CRIMINAL CARTEL.

P-R-O-V-E-D.

That Australian fathers were so derelict in their duty to guard their children that you dismissed this video is beyond reprehensible. Your children will NEVER forgive you this and nor should they. That, I, one of your number, risked his life to get this video evidence to bring it out to you only for you stupid men to ignore it in favour of lies will be seen by your children and they will despise you for it.

The blood of EVERY DEAD FATHER over the last two years or so since I was first here is on the hands of EVERY FATHER HERE.

The ONLY reason any fathers had to DIE FROM SUICIDE in the LAST TWO YEARS was because of the reprehensible action of FATHERS in Australia. The ONLY reason.


Now..News.

Some points of news are as follows.

1. I have released vast numbers of videos on my own channel that you might want to go through. This includes a claimed state of WAR on the land known as Ireland. It is now LAWFUL to KILL WOMEN of voting age who are mentally competent and not muslim on the land known as Ireland.



2. Since you men were too stupid and too ignorant to use the remedy that was prepared for your for free. And since you resisted being educated against all efforts to teach you and tell you the truth. We have commercialised any assistance we give men. We have also created other services for men. We are building an entirely new jurisdiction outside the jurisdiction of any guvment. I had hoped three years ago this could be a free service run as a cooperated with the cooperation of men and on donations of money and time.

Australian men have demonstrate beyond all doubt that they are far too selfish and greedy to participate in a voluntary co-operative service for the benefit of others. So you are going to have to PAY UP FRONT for services.


We recommend you start at the downloads page. There are a lot of documents we have published that you will want to familiarise yourself with.  If you wish to avail of the services of the MBA.


3. I have released a new book called ?? which has now had more than 4,000 downloads.  It is on the downloads page above. This book is for men 16 to 30 who do not know what is going on with women and the family law courts. Many young men have thanked me profusely for this book.

Any man who does NOT pass this book to all the young men he knows is a traitor to those young men. This book has already saved many young mens lives. Many young men have cancelled their engagements on the strength of reading this book. Many more have left the Christian church because of the lies and hypocrisy of Christian Ministers.


The major offerings at the moment are the strawman recapture service and swiss bank accounts service.

The strawman recapture was offered for free and the plan was to train men to do it so that each man could help out some other men and there would be no costs involved. However you men turn down that offer. So I trained a young man and he could do the service for USD150. Men turned that down too. So I decided I would offer the service directly and price it at EUR500 to make it worth my while to do. This is still about half the price it should be and the price can vary at my sole discretion.

You men should have taken up the strawman recapture service when it was free and been enthusiastic about rolling it out because it is the PRE-REQUISITE step for gaining your freedom but still being able to operate your stawman in the public.

This is the most comprehensive and safest method of regaining control over your life as opposed to being OWNED by your guvment which you are at the moment.


The swiss bank account offer is there for men who want to get their assets out of Australia and out of the reach of the guvment. I am astonished that men are still so stupid as to leave their money in the reach of the criminals in the Australian guvment but that is your choice. You have the ability to get your assets beyond the reach of the Australian guvment. You can even do it in such a way as the Australian guvment has no way to know where your money went. We have the ability to get your money to your bank account without that transaction every being seen by the criminals in the guvment.



We also offer services to obtain World Passports and other related documents.



Gentlemen,
from November 2007 to November 2009 I worked my backside off and risked my life to take on the family courts and the guvment in Australia for YOUR BENEFIT. I, personally, could have just had Jennifer killed and moved right along. But I didnt because that would not have helped anyone but ME.

I laboured day and night to find the remedy FOR YOU MEN and see if I could make it work. Many of my colleagues working in the remedy were thrown in jail trying new things. Many walked into courts not knowing if they test they had been assigned and agreed to do worked and not knowing if they would be home for the night or in jail for the night.

Many men invested thousands of hours. I have invested more than 4,000 hours and AUD500,000 of my own money, not to mention lost income, to help you men who say you want help.

I walked in to the Australian Federal Magistrates Court on 2009-11-26 and it was my turn to take my chances with what we had developed and see how it worked or did not work. It turned out that it worked perfectly. Far better than I had imagined.

This remedy was also recently used in a German court by me as well. It again worked perfectly.

After all this time I have come to completely understand the global legal system. So much so that I have not even been SPOKEN TO by any police as they are FAR too frightened of me to talk to me.

I am in regular contact with the entire parliament of Ireland, UK and occasionally Australia. Though we are about to turn the heat up on the parliament in Australia as well as we are ready to run our first case in Australia in the new MBA LAW COURTS.

When I presented the remedy to fathers in January 2010 I had expected a warm welcome. Sure, I knew the lairs and shills in the Australian MRA world like the mods here and Ash Patil and Dads on the Air and others would slander me and tell lies about me and my work. But I had thought that Australian fathers were smart enough to see thought that.

You were not. You were stupid and ignorant in the extreme. For your stupidity and ignorance you were made to suffer more. More men died. More children died. For the SOLE reason of the stupidity and ignorance of Australian fathers in REJECTING the PROVEN remedy.

Well? Now we are ready to roll out the remedy widely. But we will only roll it out on a commercial basis because Australian fathers have proven that they will parasite off anyone who offers them free help until that man is exhausted financially and emotionally. My friend Robert Kennedy will tell you the same.

So. You now have the full suite of remedies available to you. And for your refusal to pitch in, even at a very low level, you are going to be charged fees for my time if you want to use the work I have done over this last FIVE YEARS.

Those who choose not to use this remedy. I wish you luck dealing with the criminals in the courts because you are going to need it.

Those of you who wish to avail of the Services of the MBA? You will be welcome clients. I have 30 years in IT and I always treat my paying clients very well.

Lastly?

I put in 4,000 hours over 5 years at a personal cost of AUD500,000. The output of my work and the quality thereof is obvious to anyone who cares to look.

It has all been made available for free. I have been saying to men pay me what you think the work that you have already done is worth to you. The first question I ask people who wish to become clients is How much are you willing to pay me for what I have already done for you? So far prospective clients do not like that question very much.

I have, amazingly, had four men send me a payment for what I have done as a point of honour for them. They say it would be hypocritical of me to use your work and not give you something for it.

So those of you who want to pay me for what I have done for you based on YOUR opinion of what it is worth?

You men are deservedly rebuked for not listening to me when I first came here. Many of you will know men who killed themselves in the last two years. That did not need to happen. There was no need for ANY man to be screwed over in the divorce courts these last two years. There was no need for ANY child to be snatched by DOCS in the last two years.

The only reason you men are STILL in the mess you are in is because you chose not to listen to me and take my advice. Now I have TWO MORE YEARS of evidence as to how men REFUSE to listen to the truth? I am much less inclined to be so generous with those who refused the remedy when offered.

Now Gentlemen,
for those of you who wish to live in freedom? For those of you who wish to get the guvment out of your life? Who wish to stop paying alimony, children support and (in the near future) income taxes?


If you wish to continue on the same failed path you have these last two years? Just ignore me. One day your children will find out you did that and they will not be happy about it. You men absolutely deserve any and all rebukes you get for refusing to study the remedy when it was made available three years ago and then the book two years ago. Every rebuke you get.

Best Regards

Your brother peter

Advertising Links removed by a Moderator
So…what you're advocating is effectively an Australian equivalent of the Sovereign Citizens movement, and at a cost?
Chuckle.  Just what I needed to brighten up an already boring day. 
"This includes a claimed state of WAR on the land known as Ireland. It is now LAWFUL to KILL WOMEN of voting age who are mentally competent and not muslim on the land known as Ireland."

Well that's really something.  Given your proven track record of bravery I'm guessing you'll be starting the massacre at nursing homes and hospitals.  Maybe you can move on to quadriplegics and the comatose from there.
I think this should be in the "Humorous Posts" thread.

"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realise that what you heard is not what I meant."

 
Gents,
you should take notice of these posts. These are your tax dollars at work with agents from ASIO attempting to psyop you into thinking that what I am talking about is to be dismissed out of hand without being investigated.

Einsten has something to say to you.

"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance".

Men in Australia have, in the 99.9% majority chosen WILLFULL IGNORANCE over educating themselves from information that is FREELY available over the last THREE YEARS.

Men in Australia have no one but themselves to blame for the situation in which they find themselves. You turned down the FREE REMEDY in the 99.9% majority. The remedy is still free. It is still published. You can get it from the Mens Business Association or Crimes Against Fathers site. What I am no longer willing to do is to invest vast amounts of my time and effort to help men who do not wish to be helped. You men DEMAND your slavery and abuse by DEMANDING TO BE GOVERNED rather than refusing to be governed and governing yourselves.

Every man reading this knows in his heart that he is DEMANDING the government tell him what to do. And that is a very dumb thing to do.

And as far a women being willing to come to the table and discuss these issues? Don't make me laugh. Any man stupid enough to think western women have one shred of decency in them should notice that in Ireland we have moved to an OPEN AND DECLARED STATE OF WAR and women are STILL refusing to come to the table.


And comments by ASIO agents like this

"So…what you're advocating is effectively an Australian equivalent of the Sovereign Citizens movement, and at a cost?"

are just ridiculous and you men are well advised to be denouncing Julia Gillard for overseeing a government that uses your tax dollars to pay agents to put posts like this into places like this.

The fact this is ASIO is noted by the fact that I have NEVER discussed the idea of "Sovereign Citizens" because that is a lie and a contradiction in terms.  The fact that 5 or 6 ASIO profiles show up and post things here IMMEDIATELY I come back to tell you men of our progress should tell you men just how seriously the guvment takes me and how much the guvment does NOT want you to hear what I have to say.

And you men are so stupid you listen to paid ASIO agents rather than me. And then you want my help for free? Nope. You can have your guvments help for "free". Just remember that "free" help from your guvment is paid for by your tax dollars….the "help" you are getting from your guvments is not "free" at all. The cost is just hidden in "taxes"…none of which you HAVE to pay by the way.

I find it interesting that not ONE MAN in Australia wants to do what it takes to stop paying alimony and child support…or income taxes for that matter.

Well? have fun paying for all that "free" guvment help gentlemen.

Those who want to leave the system of guvment slavery? You can start here. If you want to remain a slave? You are, explicitly, no longer my concern. You can not be helped.
PeterNolan said
And comments by ASIO agents like this

"So…what you're advocating is effectively an Australian equivalent of the Sovereign Citizens movement, and at a cost?"
  Sleepy wrote that. No question he is a spook - mad Nolan says so! He should immediately get admin to change his user name to James Bond or 007 or apply to the CIA for work - I think they pay better.
Conan said
PeterNolan said
And comments by ASIO agents like this

"So…what you're advocating is effectively an Australian equivalent of the Sovereign Citizens movement, and at a cost?"
 Sleepy wrote that. No question he is a spook - mad Nolan says so! He should immediately get admin to change his user name to James Bond or 007 or apply to the CIA for work - I think they pay better.

And on what evidence do you say "sleepy" is not sponsored by ASIO or the Illuminati?

Then Sleepy might want to not say things that are so clearly wrong and so easily refutable.

And another good question for "sleepy" is why would he make a statement that is so clearly demonstrable as false as well as being the SAME statement that has been widely made about me by known ASIO agents?

Is it an "accident" sleepy would make such a false statement which just so happens to be a false statement that has been consistently used by ASIO?

If sleepy is not ASIO (and I do not watch these forums as the men here have made themselves mostly irrelevant) then who TOLD sleepy to make that comment?

For it is not very likely he came up with that statement for himself when it is the same false idea that has been put about by ASIO so much.

This site is run by guvment shills. This is obvious. The moderator here are ALL pointing men down the path of "you are subject to the family law whether you like it or not so if you want something different you need to change the law". This is a lie and I have proven that this is a lie more than three years ago. All the MRA/Fathers rights "leaders" are shills and agents. Ash Patil. Dads on the Air. Barry Williams from Lone fathers even outed himself as very likely being an agent a while ago. I have outed Paul Elam as an agent and he has not denied this outing publicly. Dean Esmay could not even respond to a single question I put to him. John the Other also ran like a scared rabbit when I posted to his video about some legislation changes in Australia.

There is not a "leading MRA" who is willing to discuss the evidence I have put forward other than Bernard Chapin. The MRA/Fathers rights areas are run by shills and I knew this four years ago. Now is the time to start to demonstrate to the average man this is the case by pointing out that the remedy has been available for THREE YEARS and it has been suppressed by MRAs/Fathers rights people.

The thing is that we are making a lot of progress now. That they Pope has resigned as a result of the work a good friend of mine, Kevin Annett, has done for nearly 20 years shows just how big a panick the PTB are now in.  No Pope has been forced from office in 600 years….a few were murdered but none have resigned. Now we have had THE POPE resign as a result of our first court case? I am rather thinking that a few more men are going to sit up and listen to what I have been saying all this time.

The ONLY reason men are abused in Australia is because they TOLERATE the abuse. I am looking for men who NO LONGER wish to tolerate being criminally abused.

Any of you here?
Sure I've had a wee bit to do with ASIO and AFP but that was in an official capacity years ago. A far more concerning issue at this point is your frequent insistence that child support is voluntary. On what basis? A flaw in the two acts of CS law? Constitutionally invalid? Some very smart, very wealthy people would've found the fault years ago if it actually existed.

Some reasoning would go a long way.

Googling 'Peter Nolan psychopath' provides some interesting results for interested parties.

PS Any mention of the Illuminati makes you sound like a paranoid, delusional conspiracy theorist. The tin foil hat wearing kind. Prove me wrong Peter, prove me wrong!

Last edit: by Sleepy

Sleepy said
Sure I've had a wee bit to do with ASIO and AFP but that was in an official capacity years ago. A far more concerning issue at this point is your frequent insistence that child support is voluntary. On what basis? A flaw in the two acts of CS law? Constitutionally invalid? Some very smart, very wealthy people would've found the fault years ago if it actually existed.

Some reasoning would go a long way.

Googling 'Peter Nolan psychopath' provides some interesting results for interested parties.

PS Any mention of the Illuminati makes you sound like a paranoid, delusional conspiracy theorist. The tin foil hat wearing kind. Prove me wrong Peter, prove me wrong!
  Sleepy,
someone must have told you to lump me in with the "sovereign citizen" groups because I have never, at ANY TIME, identified myself as a "sovereign citizen".

As far as saying if I mention the Illuminati that makes me sound like a conspiracy theorist? Well the Pope, the queen, Stephen harper and 27 other people have just been found guilty of conspiracy to commit genocide in Canada. So I am not a conspiracy theorist, I am a conspiracy factist. The fact is conspiracies exist, they always have and always will. Because all a conspiracy is is two or more people conspiring to commit a criminal act. There are MILLIONS of conspiracies happening every day.

That our guvments are criminal cartels has been PROVEN on my court video which was published here a long time ago. That David Dunkley refused to answer the question as to whether he was serving under oath was the CRIME of impersonating a public officer. Since this video PROOF of a CRIME was served on Rudd/McClelland in December 2009 and the proceeds of my house was subsequently sent to my ex in the 95% vs 5% split when even the court order said 70 / 30 PROVES that there was a conspiracy between David Dunkley, Justin Dowd, Kevin Rudd and Robert McClelland to rob me of my property so as to try and stop me from exposing the CRIMINAL CARTEL that is the Australian guvment.

PROVEN ON VIDEO Sleepy. So your claim that you need more evidence is rubbish and everyone here reading this known this. All this evidence has been in the public for more than TWO YEARS. All this evidence is nicely summarised in this book. Any man here who refuses to read this book deserves all the ills that befall him and can have no complaints.

As far as child support being voluntary. I have PROVEN that in the public. I have refused to pay court orders in both Ireland and Germany on the same basis. You are entitled to issue a bill for an order.

Now…if any man would like me to take him on as a client he is welcome to contact me. I am pretty easy to find. I am now taking on clients for this sort of law work. Everything I have done to date is in the public and men have refused to avail of all the assistance I have given them for free. They seem to be of the mindset "it can't be worth anything if he gave it away for free". So now I am charging fees for my time if any man would like my time.

That there has been a remedy available for Australian men for THREE YEARS and they have failed to use that remedy indicates that Australian men WANT TO BE VICTIMS OF THE FAMILY LAW COURTS. And if a man WANTS TO BE A VICTIM then that is fine by me. I do not have any sympathy for the men who are being victimised by the family law courts any more because quite clearly they WANT to be victimised. I would have thought men would be falling all over themselves to stop being victims of the family law courts….but not so.

I did find that surprising for a while…but now I just accept that men like their slavery. It gives them something to complain about and it allows them to abdicate all responsibility for the outcome of their lives which is the REAL "benefit" they want. They want to be able to moan and complain about how someone else victimised them but never bother to fight back themselves.

I was on a conference call with a client who is a father today and I pointed out to him that I have talked to THOUSANDS of abused fathers in Australia and only about 3 per 1,000 are willing to sit on new juries and hold criminals accountable for crimes. I pointed out to him that under "do unto others" if a man is not willing to sit on a jury for his brothers benefit then he can hardly expect his brother to sit on a jury for HIS benefit.

My client was STAGGERED that the response rate was so low…he was STAGGERED that men have no fight in them…..he really was. So we shall see if the trial and conviction, and now international arrest warrants, for the queen and the pope might put a bit of steel in the backbone of australian fathers to put julia gillard an ALL WOMEN who have committed crimes on trial.

And if Australian fathers are not willing to sit on juries to put criminal women on trial. They should just shut up and stop whining…because if they are too gutless to sit on a jury or to serve as a peace officer they deserve all the abuse women hand them because they TOLERATE IT.
There's only one thing in your posts that I take notice of and that's the fact that it's spelt GOVERNMENT, not guvment.  If you can't get something as simple as that right, how on earth can you be trusted with anything else!
Sleepy said
Sure I've had a wee bit to do with ASIO and AFP but that was in an official capacity years ago. A far more concerning issue at this point is your frequent insistence that child support is voluntary. On what basis? A flaw in the two acts of CS law? Constitutionally invalid? Some very smart, very wealthy people would've found the fault years ago if it actually existed.

Some reasoning would go a long way.

Googling 'Peter Nolan psychopath' provides some interesting results for interested parties.

PS Any mention of the Illuminati makes you sound like a paranoid, delusional conspiracy theorist. The tin foil hat wearing kind. Prove me wrong Peter, prove me wrong!

On what basis, a flaw in the 'law'.

I guess you have a difficult time reading. It's okay, most people have very short attention spans nowadays. So let me repeat it for you, as I have actually READ Peter's replies.

LEGISLATION IS NOT LAW.

Either way, if you choose to remain an ignorant slave, taht is your choice, and you will have to deal with the consequences. It is YOUR responsibility to educate yourself. And Peter has supplied links to his books on many occasions which PROVE what he says is true.

But no, let's just engage in childish character attacks. That's much more easy than actually researching and investigating evidence.

This is why men are being oppressed. Because most men are not even men, they still have the maturity level of a 16 year old. I'd advise you to grow up and actually become a real man, Sleepy.

I am not an ASIO agent!

http://peternolanstalker.blogspot.com.au/

Editor Notes and said
I have allowed the guest post to be validated even thiough I am pretty sure it is in prevous threads. Peter has also mentioned the matter heard before David Dunkley which Sec SPCA asked many questions in an effort to get to the bottom of what Peter suggests in relation to his views as to teh lawfull construct of tehe xisting Courts and the "Strawman" ideals that are part of the issue to be understood.

To date we have not had an adequate explanation of what pieces of legislation assist Peter in forming his view. Was Federal Magistarte Dunkley holding office? These are worthy of discussion and some here do not wish for that discussion but if Peter believes there is a serious breeach of the Constitutional make up and the rights of citizens then its a theory that must be got to the bottom of. I hope at some stage with proper debate we can discover exactly the detailed rational and come to an honest and serious conclusion once and for all.

Guest said
http://peternolanstalker.blogspot.com.au/

Editor Notes and said
I have allowed the guest post to be validated even thiough I am pretty sure it is in prevous threads. Peter has also mentioned the matter heard before David Dunkley which Sec SPCA asked many questions in an effort to get to the bottom of what Peter suggests in relation to his views as to teh lawfull construct of tehe xisting Courts and the "Strawman" ideals that are part of the issue to be understood.

To date we have not had an adequate explanation of what pieces of legislation assist Peter in forming his view. Was Federal Magistarte Dunkley holding office? These are worthy of discussion and some here do not wish for that discussion but if Peter believes there is a serious breeach of the Constitutional make up and the rights of citizens then its a theory that must be got to the bottom of. I hope at some stage with proper debate we can discover exactly the detailed rational and come to an honest and serious conclusion once and for all.



That is all I am asking for. Instead of the stupid ad-hoc attacks and character assassinations, why won't any of you actually address any of the points Peter has raised? I mean, how arrogant and ignorant do you people have to be  to just outright dismiss something because it doesn't fit into your dogmatic worldview?

Is it really such an absurd proposition to suggest that the government and legal system is a criminal cartel? Or is the real reason that the leaders of this website, as well as the many lawyers on this site, outright dismiss Peter's statements is because they themselves are complicit in this criminal cartel, and in the case of lawyers, are directly profiting from it? God help if people ever realize that the legal system is a criminal organization, because then maybe men would STOP going to lawyers and giving them money, thus putting the lawyers out of business?

And to all of you lawyers on here. How can you sleep at night, knowing that you are profiting off of the destruction of families? Do you people have no fear of God? Do you have no fear of karma? Do you really think that you are going to get away with your crimes of destroying so many millions of families?
TimothyL112 said
Guest said
http://peternolanstalker.blogspot.com.au/

Editor Notes and said
I have allowed the guest post to be validated even thiough I am pretty sure it is in prevous threads. Peter has also mentioned the matter heard before David Dunkley which Sec SPCA asked many questions in an effort to get to the bottom of what Peter suggests in relation to his views as to teh lawfull construct of tehe xisting Courts and the "Strawman" ideals that are part of the issue to be understood.

To date we have not had an adequate explanation of what pieces of legislation assist Peter in forming his view. Was Federal Magistarte Dunkley holding office? These are worthy of discussion and some here do not wish for that discussion but if Peter believes there is a serious breeach of the Constitutional make up and the rights of citizens then its a theory that must be got to the bottom of. I hope at some stage with proper debate we can discover exactly the detailed rational and come to an honest and serious conclusion once and for all.



That is all I am asking for. Instead of the stupid ad-hoc attacks and character assassinations, why won't any of you actually address any of the points Peter has raised? I mean, how arrogant and ignorant do you people have to be  to just outright dismiss something because it doesn't fit into your dogmatic worldview?

Is it really such an absurd proposition to suggest that the government and legal system is a criminal cartel? Or is the real reason that the leaders of this website, as well as the many lawyers on this site, outright dismiss Peter's statements is because they themselves are complicit in this criminal cartel, and in the case of lawyers, are directly profiting from it? God help if people ever realize that the legal system is a criminal organization, because then maybe men would STOP going to lawyers and giving them money, thus putting the lawyers out of business?

And to all of you lawyers on here. How can you sleep at night, knowing that you are profiting off of the destruction of families? Do you people have no fear of God? Do you have no fear of karma? Do you really think that you are going to get away with your crimes of destroying so many millions of families?

Maybe if his posts were worth addressing then they would be. You really felt passionate enough about Peter Nolans post to join this forum? Or are you an alias of Peter Nolan?
DSnME said
TimothyL112 said
Guest said
http://peternolanstalker.blogspot.com.au/

Editor Notes and said
I have allowed the guest post to be validated even thiough I am pretty sure it is in prevous threads. Peter has also mentioned the matter heard before David Dunkley which Sec SPCA asked many questions in an effort to get to the bottom of what Peter suggests in relation to his views as to teh lawfull construct of tehe xisting Courts and the "Strawman" ideals that are part of the issue to be understood.

To date we have not had an adequate explanation of what pieces of legislation assist Peter in forming his view. Was Federal Magistarte Dunkley holding office? These are worthy of discussion and some here do not wish for that discussion but if Peter believes there is a serious breeach of the Constitutional make up and the rights of citizens then its a theory that must be got to the bottom of. I hope at some stage with proper debate we can discover exactly the detailed rational and come to an honest and serious conclusion once and for all.



That is all I am asking for. Instead of the stupid ad-hoc attacks and character assassinations, why won't any of you actually address any of the points Peter has raised? I mean, how arrogant and ignorant do you people have to be  to just outright dismiss something because it doesn't fit into your dogmatic worldview?

Is it really such an absurd proposition to suggest that the government and legal system is a criminal cartel? Or is the real reason that the leaders of this website, as well as the many lawyers on this site, outright dismiss Peter's statements is because they themselves are complicit in this criminal cartel, and in the case of lawyers, are directly profiting from it? God help if people ever realize that the legal system is a criminal organization, because then maybe men would STOP going to lawyers and giving them money, thus putting the lawyers out of business?

And to all of you lawyers on here. How can you sleep at night, knowing that you are profiting off of the destruction of families? Do you people have no fear of God? Do you have no fear of karma? Do you really think that you are going to get away with your crimes of destroying so many millions of families?

Maybe if his posts were worth addressing then they would be. You really felt passionate enough about Peter Nolans post to join this forum? Or are you an alias of Peter Nolan?

So in other words, you are just happy to be a slave, and to unquestioningly accept the authority of your government and other assorted leaders. I sure hope you have no complaints when you are treated like the slave that you are. And the way things are headed, you are going to be living in a full scale police state shortly.

As Peter said, your children will curse you for being such cowards and allowing them to be enslaved in a full scale police state.

As for the lawyers here. As I said before, you may be atheists, and therefore have no fear of God. But fire will burn if you touch it, regardless of whether or not you believe fire is hot. You will not escape your karmic punishment for your sins of having destroyed so many families. I would hate to be one of you blood-sucking lawyers on the day you are brought before God for judgement.

Dirk Diggler

TimothyL112 said
DSnME said
TimothyL112 said
Guest said
http://peternolanstalker.blogspot.com.au/

Editor Notes and said
I have allowed the guest post to be validated even thiough I am pretty sure it is in prevous threads. Peter has also mentioned the matter heard before David Dunkley which Sec SPCA asked many questions in an effort to get to the bottom of what Peter suggests in relation to his views as to teh lawfull construct of tehe xisting Courts and the "Strawman" ideals that are part of the issue to be understood.

To date we have not had an adequate explanation of what pieces of legislation assist Peter in forming his view. Was Federal Magistarte Dunkley holding office? These are worthy of discussion and some here do not wish for that discussion but if Peter believes there is a serious breeach of the Constitutional make up and the rights of citizens then its a theory that must be got to the bottom of. I hope at some stage with proper debate we can discover exactly the detailed rational and come to an honest and serious conclusion once and for all.



That is all I am asking for. Instead of the stupid ad-hoc attacks and character assassinations, why won't any of you actually address any of the points Peter has raised? I mean, how arrogant and ignorant do you people have to be  to just outright dismiss something because it doesn't fit into your dogmatic worldview?

Is it really such an absurd proposition to suggest that the government and legal system is a criminal cartel? Or is the real reason that the leaders of this website, as well as the many lawyers on this site, outright dismiss Peter's statements is because they themselves are complicit in this criminal cartel, and in the case of lawyers, are directly profiting from it? God help if people ever realize that the legal system is a criminal organization, because then maybe men would STOP going to lawyers and giving them money, thus putting the lawyers out of business?

And to all of you lawyers on here. How can you sleep at night, knowing that you are profiting off of the destruction of families? Do you people have no fear of God? Do you have no fear of karma? Do you really think that you are going to get away with your crimes of destroying so many millions of families?

Maybe if his posts were worth addressing then they would be. You really felt passionate enough about Peter Nolans post to join this forum? Or are you an alias of Peter Nolan?

So in other words, you are just happy to be a slave, and to unquestioningly accept the authority of your government and other assorted leaders. I sure hope you have no complaints when you are treated like the slave that you are. And the way things are headed, you are going to be living in a full scale police state shortly.

As Peter said, your children will curse you for being such cowards and allowing them to be enslaved in a full scale police state.

As for the lawyers here. As I said before, you may be atheists, and therefore have no fear of God. But fire will burn if you touch it, regardless of whether or not you believe fire is hot. You will not escape your karmic punishment for your sins of having destroyed so many families. I would hate to be one of you blood-sucking lawyers on the day you are brought before God for judgement.


Sorry Timothy.  He lost me at his statement that it is now lawful to murder women in Ireland BECAUSE HE SAID SO.  In fact his whole assertions carry the same tone.  They are right BECAUSE HE SAID SO.  Without providing any actual proof.  And he always seems to be asking for people to pay him for services that were never requested.  He may have avoided paying child support, but that seems to be because he is hiding out in Germany on an overstayed visitor's visa.  If he tries to leave Germany I'm sure the German authorities will detain him.  He admits to not paying their court imposed fines.  Although the police may not be actively looking for him because these are just civil matters, these things have a way of coming to the surface eventually, and as I say, if he tries to leave Germany he will be detained.   :lol:
Guest said
TimothyL112 said
DSnME said
TimothyL112 said
Guest said
http://peternolanstalker.blogspot.com.au/

Editor Notes and said
I have allowed the guest post to be validated even thiough I am pretty sure it is in prevous threads. Peter has also mentioned the matter heard before David Dunkley which Sec SPCA asked many questions in an effort to get to the bottom of what Peter suggests in relation to his views as to teh lawfull construct of tehe xisting Courts and the "Strawman" ideals that are part of the issue to be understood.

To date we have not had an adequate explanation of what pieces of legislation assist Peter in forming his view. Was Federal Magistarte Dunkley holding office? These are worthy of discussion and some here do not wish for that discussion but if Peter believes there is a serious breeach of the Constitutional make up and the rights of citizens then its a theory that must be got to the bottom of. I hope at some stage with proper debate we can discover exactly the detailed rational and come to an honest and serious conclusion once and for all.



That is all I am asking for. Instead of the stupid ad-hoc attacks and character assassinations, why won't any of you actually address any of the points Peter has raised? I mean, how arrogant and ignorant do you people have to be  to just outright dismiss something because it doesn't fit into your dogmatic worldview?

Is it really such an absurd proposition to suggest that the government and legal system is a criminal cartel? Or is the real reason that the leaders of this website, as well as the many lawyers on this site, outright dismiss Peter's statements is because they themselves are complicit in this criminal cartel, and in the case of lawyers, are directly profiting from it? God help if people ever realize that the legal system is a criminal organization, because then maybe men would STOP going to lawyers and giving them money, thus putting the lawyers out of business?

And to all of you lawyers on here. How can you sleep at night, knowing that you are profiting off of the destruction of families? Do you people have no fear of God? Do you have no fear of karma? Do you really think that you are going to get away with your crimes of destroying so many millions of families?

Maybe if his posts were worth addressing then they would be. You really felt passionate enough about Peter Nolans post to join this forum? Or are you an alias of Peter Nolan?

So in other words, you are just happy to be a slave, and to unquestioningly accept the authority of your government and other assorted leaders. I sure hope you have no complaints when you are treated like the slave that you are. And the way things are headed, you are going to be living in a full scale police state shortly.

As Peter said, your children will curse you for being such cowards and allowing them to be enslaved in a full scale police state.

As for the lawyers here. As I said before, you may be atheists, and therefore have no fear of God. But fire will burn if you touch it, regardless of whether or not you believe fire is hot. You will not escape your karmic punishment for your sins of having destroyed so many families. I would hate to be one of you blood-sucking lawyers on the day you are brought before God for judgement.


Sorry Timothy.  He lost me at his statement that it is now lawful to murder women in Ireland BECAUSE HE SAID SO.  In fact his whole assertions carry the same tone.  They are right BECAUSE HE SAID SO.  Without providing any actual proof.  And he always seems to be asking for people to pay him for services that were never requested.  He may have avoided paying child support, but that seems to be because he is hiding out in Germany on an overstayed visitor's visa.  If he tries to leave Germany I'm sure the German authorities will detain him.  He admits to not paying their court imposed fines.  Although the police may not be actively looking for him because these are just civil matters, these things have a way of coming to the surface eventually, and as I say, if he tries to leave Germany he will be detained.   :lol:


Just wondering, how do you know so much about Peter, where he is staying, his visa situation, etc? You're the one that brought that up, which is why I ask. Let me guess, you are a paid ASIO agent, and that is how you know so much about him.

Now your point about you disagree with his statement about there being an open state of war in Ireland.

I think his point is pretty simple- women are perfectly happy that men should not have the protection of the law, so women cannot complain when they themselves have no protection of the law, either. That is equality, is it not?

And there is very clearly been a war against men for the past 40 or 50 years, in the guise of feminism. How many hundreds of millions of men's lives in the West have been destroyed by criminal women through divorce, through false rape accusations, false DV charges, false sexual harassment claims, kidnapping men's children from them, etc? It is beyond doubt that there has been a state of war against men for the past 40 or so years.

So equality means EQUAL STANDARDS. If women are perfectly happy to wage a war against men, and that men should not have the protection of the law, then it is only fair that the same is applied to women, hence the state of war against women that Peter has declared.

But I'd rather let Peter speak for himself on these points. This is just my understanding of what he has written.
Timothy,

           I wore boots and carried a rifle for ten years for my country including going to war. I'm more than confident that I've seen and done enough to consider myself a mature minded man so pardon me but f**k you. Your mate is an idiot and your god fearing tripe makes you seem equally moronic.

Either explain the rationale of yours/Peter's case at law or stay off this site.

PS If you want to exchange insults then 'man' up and we can do so in person. Be prepared for consequences.
I suggest we leave Peter Pan & his lost boy Timothy to sprout their purile BS amongst themselves and don't extend them the dignity of engaging in any kind of response.

Their posts (and our subsequent replies) do nothing for the integrity of this forum but devalue the wealth of resources, information & support available here.

Mark Twain said
Do not argue with an idiot they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realise that what you heard is not what I meant."

 
1 guest and 0 members have just viewed this.

Recent Tweets