Donate Child Support Calculator
Skip navigation

verdad questions re Petitions

I hear you Verdad.
Verdad, your language is a little tech and legal, if I can use that term, but whether your being derogatory or positive is accepted in the positive as that is who I am, say what you mean and believe or ask what is meant and accept what is said has bona-fides behind the words said.

Yes, I believe I can help those individuals who are in need of support in a limited capacity.

Family Law is evolving and the question is; are the judges allowing it to evolve in a positive direction for the purpose of the Family Law and Court or the destruction of the Family Unit that is the formation and foundation of the Human Race and our society. The Marriage Act  and Family Law Act cause the family unit to be the fundamental and ultimate consideration of the Courts prior to the best interest of the children due to the family unit as a whole unit is in the best interests of children and people as an enduring species on the face of the earth.

That is, the earth can survive without people, but at present, people cannot survive without the earth.

Maybe you can tell me why judges of the Family Court or Court Officers are doing their best to destroy the family unit and claim it is the parents who are claiming it is TOO HARD to be co-operative, for their family unit to survive their personal wants over their personal needs?

Although what I have prior said is in response to; not only what you have put but, what I see as dysfunctional orders of the Court to destroy a child's belief the long term family unit is required for establishing a lifelong Monogamous marriage as the principal requirement for the longevity of the human race.

Hence a percentage of children grow up with the personality of being vengefully violently angry due to the destruction of their natural family unit where 1 parent or the other is obstructed from constant interaction (spend time with) the other parent due to Court Orders and the want of 1 parent over the constant interaction of both parents.

Hence step parents are becoming a norm of the family unit rather than a better than nothing concept, due to the Family Court supporting woman's wants over the best interests of the child and longevity of the natural family unit.

I do appreciate the overall effect of seeking law to support a SRL who would otherwise need to know the argument to cause a McKenzie Friend to assist in other than limited capacity with the presentation of a case. The prep for a case can be done without the knowledge or leave of the Court as is demonstrated by this site.

It is the presentation of a case in Court that, should not but, does determine the direction of a judges discretionary decisions, equal with the unwritten policies of the Court, like woman's wants over the best interests of a child.   
 
In answer to the question of am I going to join is NO, because some of the Exec's of this site have taken sides with judges and a true believers stance in regard to the true (disbelief of the truth) false and fabricated photo evidence of black marker or makeup relied on by my ex.

 "Effecting changes is an art form, especially legislative changes."

This should not be so and is in breach of the purpose of the Constitution as per some of the intent of some of the words and directions of the Constitution.

That is, the people have a Constitutional Right to enact Law via the House of the Parliament via the Reps of the House through petitions. The problem is the majority of the Honourable members are more concerned they do not rock the waves of unstable waters so they are re-elected than address the issues that are destroying our society that we know should be rocked. That is a predominant lifelong Monogamous Married Unit should prevail over a dysfunctional step parent or step parent family situation.
Justin said
In answer to the question of am I going to join is NO, because some of the Exec's of this site have taken sides with judges and a true believers stance in regard to the true (disbelief of the truth) false and fabricated photo evidence of black marker or makeup relied on by my ex.
Without sighting your judgement it is challenging and unreasonable to accept the basis for your post without an undertanding of the material filed. The basis for support here is an exchange of experiences. I acknowledge your right to NOT do so. Similarly you will appreciate my rights. At all times I have put my points in a positive sense. I'm uncertain about my expression being lelgalistic on this forum.

At least you might explain why others ought to help and discourse with you if you are not willing to post here as an equal?

I bid thee well!

PS: You sure know how to provoke Conan!

What is done for you, let it be done, what you must do, be sure you do it, as the wise person does today that what the fool will do in three days - Buddha
1 guest and 0 members have just viewed this.

Recent Tweets