Donate Child Support Calculator
Skip navigation

Abrams and Demars

50/50 Week about

Interim 50/50 week about, the child is 3 years 9 months.

Father made allegations that the Mother stopped contact and applied for an AVO when she realised proceedings were afoot



Attachment

Executive Member of SRL-Resources, the Family Law People on this site (look for the Avatars) Be mindful what you post in public areas. 
Interesting, sounds very familiar.

I would still like to see Mum's who do this get put in the position of EOW for a while to get them to settle down.

For some, the loss of "custodial" parent status and gatekeeper role of the child is the only thing that shocks them into behaving.

Junior Executive of SRL-Resources

Executive Member of SRL-Resources, the Family Law People on this site (Look for the Avatars). Be mindful what you post in public areas. 
I think that the judges decision is summed up here

"Since Goode it has become clear that the court must be more proactive,at the interim stage, in bringing about a care situation for the child concerned as much in, accord with the optimal one prescribed by the relevant legislation as possible, provided it is in the childs best interests."

This is actually a more positive step from interim hearings last year, where it would not have been probable to get the same results with the same set of circumstances.

It shows the court is responding to the critical waits for final hearings, and the problems that having an unequal contact for parents causes such as continued lack of trust between parties,parental gatekeeping which leads to a definate lack of cooperation between the parties. It definalty put parents on a more equal footing for final hearings.

Rarghhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!

Han Solo routine "We're all fine here, thanks. How are you?" *weapons fire* "It was a boring conversation anyway!"
monster said
I think that the judges decision is summed up here

"Since Goode it has become clear that the court must be more proactive,at the interim stage, in bringing about a care situation for the child concerned as much in, accord with the optimal one prescribed by the relevant legislation as possible, provided it is in the childs best interests."

This is actually a more positive step from interim hearings last year, where it would not have been probable to get the same results with the same set of circumstances.

It shows the court is responding to the critical waits for final hearings, and the problems that having an unequal contact for parents causes such as continued lack of trust between parties,parental gatekeeping which leads to a definate lack of cooperation between the parties. It definalty put parents on a more equal footing for final hearings.

The faster some of these hearings can be heard -all the better for the child(ren) concerned. Even if there is a wait for the final hearing the child is not disadvantaged.

Executive Member of SRL-Resources, the Family Law People on this site (look for the Avatars) Be mindful what you post in public areas. 
1 guest and 0 members have just viewed this.

Recent Tweets